Modera M P, Dickerhoff D, Nilssen O, et al
Year:
1996
Bibliographic info:
USA, Washington DC, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Proceedings of the 1996 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, "Profiting from Energy Efficiency"

Research over the past five years has indicated that a significant majority of the cost of residential retrofit duct sealing is in the labor required to find and seal those leaks. This paper describes the results of a field investigation of the performance and practicality of sealing residential duct leaks from the inside by means of a technique based upon injecting a fine aerosol spray into the duct system. The field results presented are from 4 7 houses located in Florida. The field measurements included estimates of the labor and costs associated with conventional sealing, minute-by-minute tracking of the aerosol sealing process, and a breakdown of the time required for the various aspects of the aerosol sealing procedure, including: 1) setup, 2) aerosol injection, 3) supplementary conventional sealing, and 4) clean-up. These field tests indicated that this aerosol apparatus and injection protocol seals 60-90 cm2 of duct leakage per hour of injection time in the first half hour of injection, depending on the type of duct system. This sealing rate decreases to 20-40 cm2/h in the second ba1f hour as the ducts became tighter, the pressures increased, and the duct velocities decreased. Overall, the technology was found to be capable of sealing approximately 80% of the leakage it encountered, assuming that catastrophic leaks such as disconnected ducts had been repaired. The entire sealing protocol, including supplementary conventional sealing, took an average of 5.5 person-hours for the entire sample. The injection process itself represented approximately 20% of this time, and thus the overall time required was found to decrease significantly as the set-up and clean-up procedures were improved.