Mechanical ventilation of the underfloor space is one of the most effective ways of reducing radon levels in buildings with suspended timber floors. There is a question however whether this ventilation should be supply or extract, sometimes extract is more effective, soinetiines supply is inore effective. This report presents a simple analysis of the problem and suggests the hypothesis that the relative effectiveness of supply or extract ventilation to the underfloor space depends on the relative airtightness of the floor and the soil or oversite surface. The analysis suggests that if the floor is relatively tight then supply ventilatioil inay be more effective whereas if the floor is relatively leaky or there is oversite concrete then extract may be better. It is suggested that in either case it is better to keep the underfloor pressure low and that when mechanical ventilation is provided to the underfloor space it lnay be necessary to increase the number of airbricks.
The mechanical ventilation of suspended timber floors for radon remediation - a simple analysis.
![](https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/default_images/default_image_5.png)
Year:
1994
Bibliographic info:
15th AIVC Conference "The Role of Ventilation", Buxton, UK, 27-30 September 1994